Top 15 Popular Slots in Indonesia | SpinMetrics
These rankings describe exposure in a bounded research sample. They do not measure local players or revenue.
How we rank gamesIndonesia: 15 ranked games, citations and update dates
- 1
Gates of Olympus 2500
Pragmatic Play
- Research score / 100
- 93.64
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
93.64 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 2
- Research score / 100
- 88.05
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
88.05 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 3
Mahjong Ways
PG Soft
- Research score / 100
- 87.45
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
87.45 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 4
Wild Bounty Showdown
PG Soft
- Research score / 100
- 84.17
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
84.17 / 100 - 5
Gates of Olympus Super Scatter
Pragmatic Play
- Research score / 100
- 83.86
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
83.86 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 6
Sweet Bonanza 2500
Pragmatic Play
- Research score / 100
- 83.67
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
83.67 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 7
Mahjong Ways 2
PG Soft
- Research score / 100
- 82.58
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
82.58 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 8
Lucky Neko
PG Soft
- Research score / 100
- 80.68
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
80.68 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 9
Piñata Wins
PG Soft
- Research score / 100
- 80.32
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
80.32 / 100 Research citations · 3
- piñata wins buy feature ep. 14 #slots #casinoPublished
- Pinata Wins Ep11Published
- Pinata WinsPublished
- 10
Sugar Rush 1000
Pragmatic Play
- Research score / 100
- 80.27
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
80.27 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 11
Hot Hot Fruit
Habanero
- Research score / 100
- 79.99
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
79.99 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 12
Wild Bandito
PG Soft
- Research score / 100
- 79.91
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
79.91 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 13
Sweet Bonanza 1000
Pragmatic Play
- Research score / 100
- 77.99
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
77.99 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 14
Fortune Rabbit
PG Soft
- Research score / 100
- 76.92
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
76.92 / 100 Research citations · 3
- 15
Fortune Tiger
PG Soft
- Research score / 100
- 74.05
- Sources
- 3
- Updated
74.05 / 100 Research citations · 3
Research method and limits
YouTube search via SearchAPI, videos 3 Aug-31 Oct 2026; lifetime worldwide views, not in-country; no player/revenue data. Scores not comparable across markets.
How we rank gamesPublished: 31 October 2026 · Updated: 31 October 2026
Gates of Olympus 2500 (Pragmatic Play) leads this editorial list of the most popular slots Indonesia’s localized YouTube searches surfaced in the 31 October 2026 snapshot. This is a visibility sample, not a count of local players.
Views are lifetime worldwide YouTube counts, not in-country views, player counts or revenue. Scores cannot be compared across markets. How we rank games.
How we ranked slots in Indonesia
The publication window covers 3 August–31 October 2026, with the final day partly elapsed. Collection ran from 10:04 to 10:16 UTC on 31 October. Researchers nominated 34 candidates, then used two matched ranking searches per candidate with Indonesia country and language settings. The bounded search sample is not a census of YouTube or Indonesian audiences.
After deduplication and exclusions, 336 videos were eligible across the candidate set. Each qualifying game needed at least three eligible videos from two channels. Scoring kept up to three highest-view videos per channel per game and clipped each video's view contribution at 18,567, the pooled eligible-video 95th percentile.
The score weights are 25% selected video count, 25% clipped views, 20% distinct channels, 15% selected-video median views and 15% recency. The first four components use log-scaled normalization across all 28 qualifying candidates; recency uses a 30-day half-life.
Top 15 at a glance
The following order and scores reproduce the provisional research snapshot. Scores are shown out of 100 and apply only to this Indonesia sample.
Rank 1: Gates of Olympus 2500 (Pragmatic Play)
Gates of Olympus 2500 — Pragmatic Play; 93.64.
Rank 2: Fortune Garuda 1000 (JILI)
Fortune Garuda 1000 — JILI; 88.05.
Rank 3: Mahjong Ways (PG Soft)
Mahjong Ways (PG Soft) — PG Soft; 87.45.
Rank 4: Wild Bounty Showdown (PG Soft)
Wild Bounty Showdown — PG Soft; 84.17.
Rank 5: Gates of Olympus Super Scatter (Pragmatic Play)
Gates of Olympus Super Scatter — Pragmatic Play; 83.86.
Rank 6: Sweet Bonanza 2500 (Pragmatic Play)
Sweet Bonanza 2500 — Pragmatic Play; 83.67.
Rank 7: Mahjong Ways 2 (PG Soft)
Mahjong Ways 2 (PG Soft) — PG Soft; 82.58.
Rank 8: Lucky Neko (PG Soft)
Lucky Neko — PG Soft; 80.68.
Rank 9: Piñata Wins (PG Soft)
Piñata Wins — PG Soft; 80.32.
Rank 10: Sugar Rush 1000 (Pragmatic Play)
Sugar Rush 1000 — Pragmatic Play; 80.27.
Rank 11: Hot Hot Fruit (Habanero)
Hot Hot Fruit — Habanero; 79.99.
Rank 12: Wild Bandito (PG Soft)
Wild Bandito — PG Soft; 79.91.
Rank 13: Sweet Bonanza 1000 (Pragmatic Play)
Sweet Bonanza 1000 — Pragmatic Play; 77.99.
Rank 14: Fortune Rabbit (PG Soft)
Fortune Rabbit — PG Soft; 76.92.
Rank 15: Fortune Tiger (PG Soft)
Fortune Tiger — PG Soft; 74.05.
Notes on confidence and caveats
Sample confidence is medium or low. The detailed source gives Mahjong Ways (PG Soft) and Mahjong Ways 2 (PG Soft) limited corroboration of Indonesia relevance from Bahasa metadata and Indonesia Google Trends; other rows have low relevance confidence. None of these signals locates viewers. Mahjong Ways (PG Soft) also retains ambiguity where four titles do not explicitly identify the original edition.
Fortune Garuda 1000's JILI attribution relies on a branded campaign asset with a provenance caveat. Its provider-domain product page could not be fetched in the research. Game names and provider evidence do not establish local audience size.
The separate Google Trends check did not establish a robust upward game trend. Sparse observations and zero baselines cannot support reliable growth claims. Google Trends is not included in the YouTube score.
The supplied verification report records a pass for arithmetic, provenance, dates and report consistency, including offline reproduction. All 45 sample links have exact publication metadata. Videos were not watched in full, and verification does not establish viewer location or a representative market sample.
Data gaps
- In-country audience data: Not listed in our current sources.
- Player data: Not listed in our current sources.
- Revenue data: Not listed in our current sources.
Source record
This draft uses data/rankings/id.json, indonesia/top15.md, indonesia/top15.json, indonesia/verification.json and the vault note Ranking — Indonesia 2026-10-31. It retains the snapshot's provisional status. Missing game specifications are listed on the individual game drafts. Game filenames use the canonical slugs from the market ranking file; each game draft cites only that market’s source videos.
Compare with the other market
Read the other market for its own source sample and confidence notes. Scores use separate candidate sets and cannot be compared across markets.
FAQ
What is the #1 slot in Indonesia on this list?
Gates of Olympus 2500 (Pragmatic Play) ranks #1 with 93.64/100 in the 31 October 2026 snapshot.
Do higher ranks mean better RTP?
No. The ranking measures YouTube search exposure, not RTP, volatility or payouts.
Where does the data come from?
Public YouTube searches through SearchAPI, using the 3 August–31 October 2026 video publication window. The last day was partly elapsed at collection. The scoring method is described above.
Confidence by game
How we rank gamesGates of Olympus 2500
Medium sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown. Recent September28 launch can create a temporary exposure burst.
Fortune Garuda 1000
Low sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown. One channel supplies 78% of raw views. Provider attribution has a campaign-source provenance caveat.
Mahjong Ways
Medium sample confidence; limited corroboration for Indonesia relevance. Bahasa text and geo=ID Trends support relevance, but do not locate viewers. Four canonical-name titles do not explicitly say edition1; family ambiguity remains.
Wild Bounty Showdown
Medium sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown.
Gates of Olympus Super Scatter
Low sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown. Sensitivity rank changes by up to 4 places.
Sweet Bonanza 2500
Medium sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown.
Mahjong Ways 2
Medium sample confidence; limited corroboration for Indonesia relevance. Bahasa text and geo=ID Trends support relevance, but do not locate viewers.
Lucky Neko
Medium sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown.
Piñata Wins
Medium sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown.
Sugar Rush 1000
Medium sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown.
Hot Hot Fruit
Low sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown. Sensitivity rank changes by up to 4 places.
Wild Bandito
Low sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown. One channel supplies 64% of raw views.
Sweet Bonanza 1000
Medium sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown.
Fortune Rabbit
Low sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown. Sensitivity rank changes by up to 10 places.
Fortune Tiger
Medium sample confidence; low for Indonesia relevance. Localized search includes international content; audience geography unknown.
What does the research score measure?
The score summarizes exposure in a bounded research sample. It does not measure player counts, revenue or winning chances. Scores cannot be compared across markets.